User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; ; U; Linux armv7l; zh-cn) AppleWebKit/534.26+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.26+ Kindle SkipStone 1.0.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Kindle SkipStonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux AmazonKindletabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SkipStone 1.0.1closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 534.26 AmazonKindle Touch or laterereaderyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0closeX11 AmazonKindleOther Mobileyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:38:58 | by ThaDafinser