User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; xx; samsung-gt-e2202) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/83/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesGeneral CrawlersCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 8.5WebKit Samsunggt-e2202smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close Samsunggt-e2202closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 8.5Gecko SamsungMetromobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:00 | by ThaDafinser