User agent detail

emobile/1.0.0 (H11T; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Local/ja UNTRUSTED/1.0)

Detected by 5 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
emobile 1.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
ToshibaH11Tmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close J2ME MidletFeature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:00 | by ThaDafinser