User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-CN; Amaze 4G Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.360 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 9.5U3 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 9.5WebKit Android 4.1HTCAmaze 4Gsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0closeAndroid 4.1.2HTCAmaze 4Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 9.5Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.2HTCAmaze 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:02 | by ThaDafinser