User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Iron/26.0.1450.0 Chrome/26.0.1450.0 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Iron 26.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1450.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Iron 26.0WebKit Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1450.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iron 26.0.1450closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Iron 26.0Webkit 537.36Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1450.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:02 | by ThaDafinser