User agent detail

Lenovo-A788t_TD/S100 Linux/3.4.39 Android/4.3 Release/08.15.2013 Browser/AppleWebkit534.30 Mobile Safari/534.30; 360browser(securitypay,securityinstalled); 360(android,uppayplugin); 360 Aphone Browser (1.0)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.3LenovoA788tsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeAndroid 4.3LenovoA788t_TDcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 1.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.3LenovoA788mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
360 Browser closeAndroid 4.3LenovoA788tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:04 | by ThaDafinser