User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; GT-T959 Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.138 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGT-T959smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2GT-T959closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2SamsungGalaxy S Vibrantmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.138closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:04 | by ThaDafinser