User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.2; HTC 802w Build/LRX22G; wv) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/42.0.2311.137 Mobile Safari/537.36; 360 Aphone Browser (6.9.7)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.137closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 6.9WebKit Android 5.0HTC802wsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.137closeAndroid 5.0.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 5.0.2HTC802wcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.9.7Blink 537.36Android 5.0.2HTCOnemobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.137closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
360 Browser closeAndroid 5.0HTC802wSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:05 | by ThaDafinser