User agent detail

MQQBrowser/35 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 3GS; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8B117 Safari/7534.48.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 35WebKit iOS 4.1AppleiPhone 3GSsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 4.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 35closeiOS 4.1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 3.5Webkit 532.9iOS 4.1AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:05 | by ThaDafinser