User agent detail

Browse/0.5 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; Moto G (2014) Build/LMY47Z) WebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/42.0.2311.138 Mobile Mozilla/5.0

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.138closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 5.1Motorolaosmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.138closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 5.1.1MotorolaG (2014)closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 42Blink 537.36Android 5.1.1MotorolaMoto G (Google Edition, 2014)mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 39closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:08 | by ThaDafinser