User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; CPU OS 8_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/600.1.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) CriOS/39.0.2171.50 Mobile/12B440 Safari/600.1.4 (000792)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 39.0WebKit iOS 8.1AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile iOS 39.0WebKit iOS 8.1AppleiPadtabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.50closeiOS 8.1.2closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile iOS 39.0.2171closeiOS 8.1.2AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 39Webkit 600.1.4iOS 8.1.2AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.50closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile on iOS 41closeiOS 8.1.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:08 | by ThaDafinser