User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; SlidePad 104 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31 OPR/14.0.1074.58201

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera Mobile 14.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 14.0.1074.58201closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 14.0Presto Android 4.1MemupSlidePad 104tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 14.0.1074.58201closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 14.0.1074closeAndroid 4.1.1SlidePad 104closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera 14.0Webkit 537.31Android 4.1.1MemupSlidepad 104tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 14.0.1074.58201closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:08 | by ThaDafinser