User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 SH905i(c100;TB;W24H16) (compatible; Mediapartners-Google/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 6 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMediapartners-Googleclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
closeyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:09 | by ThaDafinser