User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.49 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1196.45 (Edition Next)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 16.0Blink MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1196.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Next 16.0Blink Mac 10.9desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeOS X 10.9.0closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1196closeMac OS X 10.9.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Next 16.0Blink 537.36OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16.0.1196.29closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:09 | by ThaDafinser