User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.91 Safari/537.36 OPR/20.0.1387.37 (Edition Next-Campaign 21)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
yesFake ChromeCrawler Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 20.0.1387.37closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera Next 20.0Blink Windows 7desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 20.0.1387closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Next 20.0Blink 537.36Windows 7desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 20.0.1387.37closeMac OS X 1091Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:15 | by ThaDafinser