User agent detail

MQQBrowser/4.3/Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-cn; VOTO_VT818_TD/1.0 Android/4.0.3 Release/7.1.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Build/MocorDroid4.0.3) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
QQbrowser WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 4.3WebKit MocorDroid 4.0VotoVT818smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 4.3closeAndroid 4.0.3VOTO_VT818_TD/1.0 Android/4.0.3 Release/7.1.2013 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 4.3Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3VOTO_VT818_TDmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:16 | by ThaDafinser