User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/532 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A538b Safari/419.3 Midori/0.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 3.0WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Midori 0.4WebKit iOS 3.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0closeOS X closeiPhonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeiOS 3.0AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Midori 0.4Webkit 532iPhone OS 1.0desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:18 | by ThaDafinser