User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; TM105 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.132 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0ECSTM105tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.4TM105closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 33Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4ECSTM105tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.132closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.0IntelECS TM105Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:18 | by ThaDafinser