User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/18.0.1025.168 Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/537.4

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 18.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 18.0.1025closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 18.0.1025.168Webkit 537.4Linux desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.168closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.162closeOpenBSD amd64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:19 | by ThaDafinser