User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; MI 2 Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/33.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 MicroMessenger/5.4.0.51_r798589.480 NetType/WIFI

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
WeChat 5.4 Android 4.4XiaomiMI 2smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.4XiaoMiMI 2closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
WeChat 5.4.0.51Blink 537.36Android 4.4.4XiaomiMi 2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 33closeAndroid 4.4XiaomiMI-2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:20 | by ThaDafinser