User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; K010 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.135 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 36.0Blink Android 4.4AsusTransformer Pad TF103Ctabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 36.0.1985closeAndroid 4.4.2K010closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 36Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2AsusTransformer Pad TF103tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.135closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 36closeAndroid 4.4AsusK010Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:20 | by ThaDafinser