User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en; rv:1.9.0.18) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Vivaldi/1.0.83.38 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Vivaldi 1.0Blink MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Mac 10.6desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Vivaldi 1.0.83closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Vivaldi 1.0Blink 537.36Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:21 | by ThaDafinser