User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; xx; Lenovo A390t Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30; 360browser(securitypay,securityinstalled); 360(android,uppayplugin); 360 Aphone Browser (4.8.1)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 4.8WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA390tsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA390tcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 4.8.1Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3LenovoA390mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0LenovoA390tSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:22 | by ThaDafinser