User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; ZEN 4.7 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 YaBrowser/15.2.2214.3725.00 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.2WexlerZEN 4.7smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 15.2.2214.3725.00closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214closeAndroid 4.2.1ZEN 4.7closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink 537.36Android 4.2.1WexlerZen 4.7mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.2WexlerZEN 4.7Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:22 | by ThaDafinser