User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; fr-fr; Orange San Francisco Build/ERE27) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1ZTEOrangeMobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1OrangeSan Franciscosmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1.0ZTEOrange San Franciscocloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1OrangeSan Franciscomobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1OrangeSan FranciscoFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:24 | by ThaDafinser