User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; xx; KFAPWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.13 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 3.13WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 3.13Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFitabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.13closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9" WiFicloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Silk 3.13Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDX 8.9"tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.8closeAndroid AmazonKFAPWITabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:24 | by ThaDafinser