User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; SHARP/WS020SH; PPC; 480x800) Opera Mobi; Opera 9.5 [ja]

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 6.0Trident WinCE Mobile Phoneyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 9.5Presto Windows CE SharpSCH-I100smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mobi;closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.5closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Mobile Windows CE SharpWS020SHmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
MAUI Browser close OperaMini 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:28 | by ThaDafinser