User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; Galaxy Nexus Build/IMM76B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google-Publisher-Plugin) Chrome/27.0.1453 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 1 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 27.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
yesGooglebotSearch bot Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexuscloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 27Blink 537.36Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexusmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 32closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGalaxy NexusSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:29 | by ThaDafinser