User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.00) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.2

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Silk 3.2WebKit Android SonyPlaystation VitaConsoleyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Browser 3.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Mobile Silk 3.2Blink PlayStation Portable VitaSonyPlayStation Vitaconsoleyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 536.26 3.00SonyPlaystation Vitagaming:portableyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
PlayStation Vita closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyPlayStation VitaOther Mobileyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:30 | by ThaDafinser