User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F09C(c500;TB;W24H16)

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
i-mode Browser 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
DoCoMoF09Cfeature phoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF09Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
FujitsuF09Cmobile:featureyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F09Ccloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoF-09CFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:30 | by ThaDafinser