User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5ATT; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.0.5 Mobile/11B554a Safari/8536.25

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 5.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 5smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.0.5closeiOS 7.0.4closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 5.0Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:32 | by ThaDafinser