User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; AFTB Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.173 Mobile Safari/537.22 cordova-amazon-fireos/3.4.0 AmazonWebAppPlatform/3.4.0;2.0

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2AmazonFire TVTV Device Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2AmazonFire TVtvyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.2AFTBcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Amazon WebView Webkit 537.22FireOS 3AmazonFire TVtelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.173closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 25closeAndroid 4.2AmazonFire TVSmart-TVyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:32 | by ThaDafinser