User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Slackware Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.44 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.31 (Edition beta)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 25.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 25.0Blink Slackware desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.31closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Beta 25.0Blink 537.36Slackware desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.31closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.11closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:33 | by ThaDafinser