User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 3607.0.2013) AppleWebKit/537.27 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1393.2 Safari/537.27

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 26.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 26.0WebKit Chrome OS 3607.0desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS 26.0.1393.2closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1393closeChrome OS 3607.0.2013closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Dev 26.0.1393.2Webkit 537.27Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1400.0closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:37 | by ThaDafinser