User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_1; en-US) AppleWebKit/9537.73.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Safari/537.71 OmniWeb/v624.0

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Safari 7.0WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
OmniWeb 624.0WebKit Mac 10.9desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
OmniWeb v624.0closeOS X 10.9.1closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
OmniWeb 624.0closeMac OS X 10.9.1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
OmniWeb Webkit 9537.73.11OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 7.0.1closeMac OS X 10.9.1Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:37 | by ThaDafinser