User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1; zh-cn; K-Touch U86 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 baiduboxapp/042_0.4_diordna_069_045/hcuoT-K_61_2.1.4_68U+hcuoT-K/1000154c/6F7FA236825AEB575DD75F1E9DA5858A%7C106199110809368/1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1K-TouchU86smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1closeAndroid 4.1KtouchU86closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1K-TouchU86 Kissmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1K-TouchU86Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:38 | by ThaDafinser