User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; SM-G7106 Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2427.6 Mobile Safari/537.36 360 Aphone Browser (6.9.9.64beta)

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
360 Phone Browser 6.9WebKit Android 4.3SamsungSM-G7106smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 45.0.2427closeAndroid 4.3SamsungSM-G7106closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.9.9.64Blink 537.36Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy Grand 2mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2427.6closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
360 Browser closeAndroid 4.3SamsungSM-G7106Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:39 | by ThaDafinser