User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/17.0.963.26 Chrome/17.0.963.26 Safari/535.11

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chromium 17.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chromium 17.0WebKit Ubuntu 10.10desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 17.0.963closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chromium 17.0.963.26Webkit 535.11Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:39 | by ThaDafinser