User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; Atrix 4G Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.1smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.1.2Atrix 4Gcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 35Blink 537.36Android 4.1.2MotorolaATRIX 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:39 | by ThaDafinser