User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; CT1000 Build/KRT16S) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.76 Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.4CarrefourCT1000tabletyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2490closeAndroid 4.4CelkonCT1000closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 46Blink 537.36Android 4.4CT1000tabletyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 38closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:41 | by ThaDafinser