User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS x86_64 2913.193.0) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/23.0.1271.91 Safari/537.11

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 23.0WebKit Chrome OS 2913.193desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeChrome OS 23.0.1271.91closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeChrome OS 2913.193.0closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome 23Webkit 537.11Chrome OS desktopcloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.91closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeJolicloud Linux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:44 | by ThaDafinser