User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux; U; Diga; de-DE) AppleWebKit/537.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Diga/3.7.0 Chrome/23.0.1271.97 Safari/537.11

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 23.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 23.0.1271closeLinux closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 537.11 PanasonicDigatelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 23.0.1271.97closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 23.0.1240.0closeJolicloud Linux i686 Desktopcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:45 | by ThaDafinser