User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; zh-CN; Lingwin K5 Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.3.2.559 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
UC Browser 10.3U3 Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
UC Browser 10.3WebKit Android 4.3LingwinK5smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.3.2closeAndroid 4.3Lingwin K5closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
UC Browser 10.3Webkit 534.30Android 4.3Lingwin K5mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:45 | by ThaDafinser