User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD; U; Viera; xx) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/1.5.1 Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
SmartViera 1.5WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicViera TVTV Device Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome 14.0WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSmart TVtv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 14.0.835closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Viera Browser 1.5.1Webkit 535.1 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:46 | by ThaDafinser