User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.0/Mozilla/5.0 (HW-HUAWEI_C8500/C8500V100R001C92B234;U;Android/2.1;240*320;CTC/2.0) AppleWebKit/530.17 Mobile Safari/530.17

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 530.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
QQ Browser 3.0WebKit Android 2.1HuaweiC8500smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.0closeAndroid 2.1closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
QQ Browser 3.0Webkit 530.17Android 2.1HuaweiC8500mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:46 | by ThaDafinser