User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux sh4; HbbTV/1.2.1 (;Sharp;LE652;v0.1.43.5;;) CE-HTML/1.0 Config(L:deu,CC:DEU) NETRANGEMMH) Presto/2.12.362 Version/12.10

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Opera 12.10Presto GNU/Linux SharpLE652tv Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux SharpLE652closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.362 SharpLE652televisioncloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:47 | by ThaDafinser