User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; xx; LG-P860 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) CrMo/16.0.912.75 Mobile Safari/535.7

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Chrome 16.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 16.0WebKit Android 4.0LGP860smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 16.0.912closeAndroid 4.0.3LGP860closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Chrome Beta 16.0.912.75Webkit 535.7Android 4.0.3LGP860mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 16.0.912.75closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:47 | by ThaDafinser