User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Symbian; U; X7-00; xx) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows Phone 8.0; Trident/6.0; IEMobile/10.0; ARM; Touch; NOKIA; Lumia 920)/1.60 Mobile Safari/534.3

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win32 Tabletyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
IE Mobile 10.0Trident Windows Phone 8.0NokiaLumia 920smartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows Phone 8closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0NokiaLumia 920closeclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Webkit 534.3Series60 NokiaX7-00mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 10.0closeWindows Phone 8.0NokiaLumia 920Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:47 | by ThaDafinser