User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; xx; LGL16C/V100 Build/KOT49I.L16CV10a) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/34.0.1847.118 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 8 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 34.0Blink Android 4.4LGL16Csmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.4.2LGLGL16Ccloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
LG Browser Blink 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLuckymobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.118closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 34closeAndroid 4.4LGL16CSmartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:48 | by ThaDafinser