User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; SAMSUNG SM-J320F Build/LMY47V) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/3.5 Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Mobile Safari/537.36

Detected by 7 of 8 providers
As bot detected by 0 of 7

GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeActions
BrowscapPhp
6011
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.1
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 5.1SamsungSM-J320Fsmartphoneyes Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 5.1.1SamsungSM-J320Fcloseclosecloseclose Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.9
Samsung Browser 3.5Blink 537.36Android 5.1.1SamsungGalaxy J3mobile:smartyescloseclose Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 39closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-01-26 16:39:48 | by ThaDafinser